Outcomes from the first drafting meeting (to be discussed)

Declaration [resolution] of the
SUMMIT non-aligned initiatives in education culture

Outcomes from the first drafting meeting (to be discussed) - minutes at the end

Draft Declaration [resolution, action plan, final document] of the Summit non alligned initiatives in education culture

Draft after day 1 (inputs from facilitators, urgent thought, delicious wikis, architecture forum, akademeia and general public)

Recalling that resolutions and declarations have had negative impacts on both peoples personal lives as well as on the lives of groups of people
further recalling resolution 129 of the Security Council that under lawful terminology has led to a industrial redistribution of resources and war (Lawrence)
further recalling the countless resolutions and declarations as well as action plans on the palestinian people that have led to evictions (Munir)
stressing the need to learn from similar declaration processes like the World Social Forum, and explicitly the failures in these processes, turning declarations into sort of shopping lists for the different needs of groups (Rodrigo)
further stressing the need to define as well addresses as speakers of a possible final document, declaration [resolution, action plan] define who could do what in the process to come.
Questioning the consensus principle.
Acknowledging the need to preserve a variety of solutions and to accept the diversity of the different approaches in the process of giving responsibilities to the creators(akademeia)
questioning the practice to divide into cultures (minur)
recalling blog principles and other forms of knowledge sharing that go beyond linear processes of declarations and resolutions (rodrigo)
this paper
calls on the participants of this summit to consider the concepts of urgency, pluralism and local self management, as ... [to be edited],
addresses further the concept of seriousness as a translation for the necessity to carry on acting, regardless,
addresses further the need to see education as an abolitionist project with the aim to destroy the governance of knowledge by highlighting abolitionist education projects (all three urgent thought),
calls on architects to use the modalities of knowledge production in architecture in its praxis to go beyond current forms of production, in order to see architecture as an interface (learning from architecture),
to identify practical action schemes (like the GNU public license) as shared practice in defying the interests of the industry on the knowledge production process (akademeia),
akademeia acknowledges that the network is working at different papers which will be written and distributed separately by groups and people in this meeting. And they will be shared freely (akademeia)

The public drafting further considered to stop the public drafting process by going into informal meetings
This. paper just shows the inputs of The working groups of day one considers that a paper can be written by everyone at any time and that there is no need of a organized scheme.
and that As long as no one calls for it there will be no public discussion on preliminary and or final text again.
this is only a draft for discussion

Protocol yesterday:

Underlining the reservations over the official declarations

Professing-

seriousness: As a manner of carrying on regardless

privilege escalation and vulnerability

Urgency:

Pluralism : that moves away from universalism; relationality that is not dependent on the binaries of the one or the many;

We need to preserve diversities, and prevent the omologation of different traditions;

A commitment to freedom of ideas and its linkages to preserve the independence of education;

Education as an abolitionist project attempting to move away from from the injustices of 'subjugated subjects' produced by education.